Sunday, February 18, 2024

iMerc Newsletter — Vol. 5, February 2024

 



UCL iMerc Newsletter — Vol. 5, February 2024

About us

Since the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, we have been meeting regularly to share new research and insights related to diverse topics in music education, broadly conceived. We are a group of researchers at doctoral and post-doctoral levels, as well as senior researchers, with a shared curiosity and interest in advancing basic and applied research. Our monthly seminars are also designed to foster a sense of community amongst colleagues who are based in the UK, mainland Europe (Portugal, Germany, Greece), Asia (China, including Hong Kong) and Australia. Opportunity is taken each month to update current research projects and also to listen to the latest research from our invited speakers. If you would like to know more or to join us, please contact us.

 

Our upcoming research seminar is on Wednesday, 21st February 2024, 11.00-13.00 UK Time. This will be held on Zoom only. We are very happy to have Professor David-Emil Wickström, Pak Hang Wan, and YiYing Pei speak to us. Please join us by clicking the Zoom link HERE. Everyone is welcome!

In This Issue

•      Previous iMerc Research Seminar, January 2024

•      Event: 'The Bruce' Opera Premiere in Scotland

•      Presentation: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Musical Behaviour – the Significance of Context and Implications for Pedagogy

•      Tech Column: Embracing Music Tech in Early Years

•      Newly published: The Impact of Three Key Paradigm Shifts on Disability, Inclusion, and Autism in Higher Education in England: An Integrative Review

•      iMerc Research Seminar, February 2024

•      In Conversation with Dr Can Lu, January 2024

•      Upcoming Research Seminar, March 2024

•      Contact us

Previous iMerc Research Seminar, January 2024

1 - Presentation cover slide presented by Alice Bowmer

Alice Bowmer (abowm001@gold.ac.uk) updated us about her PhD project at Goldsmiths College, London. Her presentation was titled Supporting hard-to-reach parents through intervention: Does parental singing facilitate infant language behaviours? In this presentation, Alice shared the challenges and research findings to date. The study is seeking to test empirically whether singing classes supported infant language skills more than similarly designed physical/cognitive classes. Further evidence was collected on parents’ use of singing in the home.

2 - Presentation cover slide presented by Dr. Gregory Boardman

Dr Gregory Boardman (gregory.boardman.15@ucl.ac.uk) shared his ongoing UCL doctoral study update with a presentation titled musical meaning-making in the later stages of Primary education. In this presentation, Greg shared videos of his projects working with students in Primary schools. Greg also guided us in exploring participation in instrumental music-making, barriers to access and meaning-making in relation to historical, dominant, and progressive models of musical learning. Greg also shared his reflections on the implications of multimodality on classroom practitioners—if words alone fail to capture what might be observed.

3 - Presentation cover slide presented by Dr Jeehye Hwang

Dr Jeehye Hwang (jeehye.hwang.18@alumni.ucl.ac.uk) talked about her recent UCL PhD study. The presentation titled How do older adults perceive and engage in active music-making in the digital age? - Exploring lived experiences of instrumental learning and playing after retirement in South Korea. The presentation highlighted the importance of meaningful music participation in the lives of retired older adults, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of ageing and challenging societal perceptions. Key findings suggested that motivations for musical engagement intersected with life transitions associated with retiring from full-time work, demonstrating a desire for social and emotional benefits during this period.

Event: 'The Bruce' Opera Premiere in Scotland

4 - Rakihat-Bi Abdyssagin's new opera premiere poster front

5 - Rakihat-Bi Abdyssagin's new opera premiere poster back

'The Bruce', Rakhat-Bi Abdyssagin's New Opera World Premieres Scotland Tour

Rakhat-Bi is an Affiliate Academic at UCL and a member of the International Music Education Research Centre.

Trailer to the premieres: https://vimeo.com/910581005

Glasgow Cathedral, Saturday, 17th February 2024, 7 pm

St Giles' Cathedral Edinburgh, Wednesday, 21st February 2024, 7.30 pm

University of St Andrews, St Salvator's Chapel, Saturday, 24th February 2024, 5.30 pm

Dunfermline Abbey, Sunday, 3rd March 2024, 5 pm

Contact: Rakhat-Bi Abdyssagin (rahatbiabd@mail.ru)

Presentation: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Musical Behaviour— the Significance of Context and Implications for Pedagogy

Speakers: Dr Eva Wilde and Professor Graham Welch

 

The presentation reported evidence of recent research into ADHD and music education, highlighting the potential benefits of structured personalised music education (Wilde & Welch, 2022) and also music therapy (Martin-Maratinos et al, 2023). The research findings suggest that, notwithstanding ADHD-related symptoms, individuals can engage successfully in music and acquire musical skills. Moreover, ADHD is not a static condition in music, but variable according to pedagogical and musical context. For details, please read HERE from the Voice Study Centre.

Contact: Dr Eva Wilde (evawilde63@gmail.com)

Tech Column from Music Teacher Magazine: Embracing Music Tech in Early Years

Featuring: Christie Haddad

This is an interview from Music Teacher Magazine in which Christie Haddad chats with Bradley Smith about her UCL PhD research. Christie discussed the barriers to embedding technology into early years practice and shared some top music tech recommendations for Early Year Foundation Stage (EYFS) educators. For details, please read HERE from Music Teacher Magazine.

Contact: Christie Haddad (christie.haddad.18@ucl.ac.uk)

Newly published: The Impact of Three Key Paradigm Shifts on Disability, Inclusion, and Autism in Higher Education in England: An Integrative Review

Authors: Eunice Tang, Dr Austin Griffiths, Professor Graham Welch

Abstract:

In the past two decades, students have been more willing to disclose their disability status when entering higher education (HE) in the United Kingdom (UK). Concurrently, higher education institutions (HEIs) have adopted disability policies and service teams for enhancing equality, diversity, and inclusion in the UK. The purpose of this integrative review is to understand the basis of these trends. The article suggests that there have been three major key paradigm shifts that underpin this cultural change: (1) There was a paradigm shift in terms of changing the dominant models for conceptualising disability from a medical model of disability to a social model of disability and to an affirmative model of disability, together with a debate and policy development demonstrating a concern for greater social inclusion and exclusion; (2) with a massive increase in students entering HE and the rising importance of league tables and ranking systems, universities experienced a paradigm shift from teacher-centred learning (TCL) to inclusive student-centred learning and teaching (SCLT); and (3) the increase in autism disclosure in HE signifies a shift in a conceptualisation of autism from a disorder to a disability and an example of neurodiversity.

 

Reference: Tang, E. S. Y., Griffiths, A., Welch, G. F. (2024). The Impact of Three Key Paradigm Shifts on Disability, Inclusion, and Autism in Higher Education in England: An Integrative Review. Trends High. Educ. 3(1), 122-141. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3010007

Contact: Euncie Tang (eunice.tang@ucl.ac.uk)

iMerc Research Seminar, February 2024

6 - Guest Speaker: Professor David-Emil Wickström

Guest Speaker: Professor David-Emil Wickström

Topic: From Exclusion to Inclusion - The Roles of Music in Inclusion

Professor David-Emil Wickström (david-emil.wickstroem@popakademie.de)

David-Emil Wickström studied Scandinavian studies, musicology and ethnomusicology at the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, University of Bergen and University of Copenhagen. His areas of research include the revival of Norwegian traditional vocal music, post-Soviet popular music (especially in Russia, Belarus, Ukraine and Germany) as well as higher music education. Currently employed as a Professor of popular music history at the Popakademie Baden-Württemberg he is also the program director for the artistic Bachelor degree programs “Pop Music Design” and "World Music”. He is a member of the research group "Russian Space? Concepts, Practices, Representations (RSCPR)” at UiT Noregs arktiske universitet. In addition, he chairs the editorial board of the AEC project "Power relations in Higher Music Education”.

David-Emil's Abstract:

Children in kindergartens and schools in central Europe reflect the cultural complexity of a population that today is definitely not homogeneous. But do the musical contents taught reflect this complexity? Music can play several roles in an (early) musical education, such as training coordination skills or promoting teamwork through communal singing. Another important point would be to establish musical acquaintance with other cultures and thus an understanding of difference and diversity in the population among children. In other words, promoting respect and tolerance. In order to create a sense of belonging, music can only act as a communication bridge if it does not come (exclusively) from a Christian-European hegemonic perspective. The musics and religions of the actual children in a class or group must be taken into account. Music is - similar to a language - a semiotic system that has to be learned. This is not only about understanding other musical traditions. It also includes learning the languages of the musics that are based on Central European art music or Anglo-American popular music. Thus, in addition to the question of inclusion and as a sign of respect, listening to other musical systems is essential in order to understand and comprehend them.

7 - Speaker: Pak Hang Wan

Speaker: Pak Hang Wan

Topic: An Ethnographic Study of Music Engagement Programmes in London and Their Social Impact

Pak Hang Wan (pak.wan.20@ucl.ac.uk)

As an educator who has also worked in classical music marketing, administration, and academic publishing, I would like to make a contribution towards educational programmes offered by government and nonprofit organisations in music. My aim is to investigate the differences in programme design, implementation and most notably, the social impact for future development between organisations with varying levels of resources. I hope my empirical research will result in cross-fertilisation of good practices.

Pak's Abstract:

Young people have been exposed to music from school lessons and extracurricular activities since it was introduced to mainstream compulsory education. As demographic structure changes after WWII, many educators influenced by sociological theories have been attempting to democratise music education, making it more inclusive for all. With more professional and nonprofit organisations joining the field of music engagement, the division between formal and informal learning is becoming fuzzier in recent years. By exploring the inner-workings of music engagement programme providers in some of the most socially diverse areas in London, this ethnographic study is an exploratory journey to discover practitioners’ authentic attitude and how they navigate in an ecology of social change and government policies.

8 - Speaker: Yiying Pei

Speaker: Yiying Pei

Topic: Culture, Taste, and Identity: Young People’s Family Music Cultivation and Instrument Learning Experience

Yiying Pei (peiyy1223@163.com)

Yiying Pei is a PhD student from East China Normal University majoring in the Sociology and Cultural Studies of Education. She holds a Master of Education from the same university. She explored the instrument learning experience of young people during her master's study. The findings indicate a connection between family music cultivation and cultural reproduction and how music activities in school and daily life influence young people’s musical identity. Her research interests focus on music education, sociology of education, youth culture studies, and media studies.

Yiying's Abstract:

Instrument learning as a family parenting practice is beneficial to children’s development. More and more children begin to learn an instrument when they are young. The long-lasting instrument learning experience is interwoven with their family and school life, forming part of their lived experience and has an impact on their everyday life and development. The research intends to discover young people's instrument learning experience through semi-structured interview under the instruction of the methodology of narrative inquiry.

It is found that instrument learning is a strategy of cultural reproduction which helps pass on cultural capital through the family in a hidden or conscious way. Parents’ participation, expectation, and decision on children’s education affect the way of reproduction. The musical instrument grading exam defines the standard of musical ability. Through the training of the body, young people not only grasp music skills but also obtain a sense of music, which influences their music taste and judgement. Instrument learning is embedded in young people’s education and is reflected in their musical practices. It has an impact on their school education and daily life. In the process of socialization, the value of instrument learning is constructed, which turns out to be paradoxical. Some gain help from music learning, while others suspend music learning because of academic pressure and find it hard to obtain a musical identity in school. The experience of instrument learning cultivates young people’s aesthetics and disposition, brings them opportunities as they grow up, helps them obtain emotional healing in their daily lives, and constructs their musical identity.

In Conversation with Dr Can Lu, February 2024

9 - First picture of Dr Can Lu's son

10 - The beautiful lake view from Jiangsu, China

Dr Can Lu passed her doctoral viva on 11 January 2024 with minor corrections. We were fortunate to interview her before she welcomed a new member into her family— her son was born on 3 February 2024 at 10.39 am in Jiangsu, China. Can is currently in good hands under the care of her family. Here is an interview about her doctoral experience. Warmest congratulations to Can for her double happiness!

1. Can you tell us a bit about yourself?

Hello. My name is Can Lu (can.lu.16@alumni.ucl.ac.uk). When I was a child, my mother always thought that I have a musical talent, and my teacher thought the same way, so I’ve always been provided a lot of opportunity of music training or performances. I went to high school, where I studied folk music, and later went to a music college for a bachelor’s degree. Then I went to University of York to study community music and music education. After that, I started working with Professor Welsh for my PhD. I thought maybe I should start with something basic. I guess singing is a good topic to start. So there’s a very nice programme called Sing Up, which is a national programme in the UK. I started thinking, maybe I can do something similar in China. I then started to do this research with my supervisors. But I didn't realise it was a huge programme then. It's a national programme. And it’s just only me in my study. I didn't realise the programme was a huge one. So it took so many years to finish. And now, finally, I finished it.

2. Congratulations! Can you share your doctoral experience with us?

I didn't know a lot of things about research at the beginning. When I started my PhD, I knew nothing about research. So I took a lot of courses, but I didn't really know why I should take them, and I didn't know how to choose. So, I spent a lot of time taking some courses that were unnecessary. But anyway, it's a journey.

In the first two years, I didn't know what to do. I had no clear plan, so the progress was very slow. After the upgrade, I then started to collect data. And that data was huge compared with other doctoral colleagues: I had over 1,000 participants across six schools. I enjoyed the progress of data collection. It was nice to talk to children and their teachers. And then I came back to the UK to analyse my data. It was a huge amount of data set, and how we measured it was quite subjective. In order to ensure the reliability of my study, I measured all the data 3 times until I thought the analyses were reliable. When I measured each data, it would take around one and a half or two months. It's a very time-consuming process. Finally, when I finished the data measurement, I had no idea how to analyse them in a more efficient way. It was because I had limited knowledge about statistical analysis. I started reading books and texts and taking some courses, but still, it was quite difficult because I wasn’t sure whether it was a good way or the right way to analyse them.

After discussing it with my supervisor, I thought we could analyse the data differently. So, we started exploring a new tool. Because the tool was not really available at the time. Eventually, we found the tool, and it was also time-consuming to use the tool. Don’t get me wrong. It's a very good one. I couldn’t remember how many times I spent using this tool to analyse my data. The data was very rich. It’s just time-consuming and takes lots of patience. It's quite easy to give up at that stage. And yeah, finally, I believe that I finished it. In the first three years, I thought I should do this national project. One day, I realised, Oh, my God, it's too huge! I couldn't do this in one PhD. I couldn't manage this on time. So, I decided to focus on one section, which was the first section on children's singing performance for this PhD. I was more focused by then. And the workload was much reduced. I just focused on that part and did the analysis. I started to write my analyses in my fourth year. My English was very limited, so that was another challenge. I was very pleased that I didn't give up, although it's a huge amount of effort and time for each step of my PhD journey. It's just time-consuming. I spent eight years finishing my PhD. I didn't know what other people had done. Anyway, this is what I have done and what I experienced.

"Never give up— just keep going. You will get there one day. For international students, it’s important to be independent, practise your English, work on yourself, and understand your topic well."

3. Were you doing the PhD full-time or part-time?

I was doing it full-time.

4. I see. Do you have any advice for those who just started their PhDs?

First of all, the project shouldn't be too big. If you have a big sample and just focus on one thing, then it will be good. Having foundation knowledge for research would be beneficial before starting a doctoral journey. Life would be much easier.

5. Any tips about preparing viva?

I was asked: What is your contribution to knowledge? What is your favourite finding in your study? These are the common ones. Based on my experience, the examiner picked up something I didn't explain clearly, or they may have different opinions or thoughts. You really need to know the process, especially for the methodology section. You need to know what you have done, what, and why.

6. What do you like most about the IOE?

I would like to take this chance to thank my supervisors, Professor Graham Welch and Dr Jo Saunders, for their professional support and kindness. I felt well-supported and confident in exploring things that I was interested in. I could ask any questions, sometimes they might be silly ones! Also, I really enjoyed the library. It is a very powerful one. I can find anything from there, anything I want— it made me feel I was supported. There were a lot of courses at the IOE, and most of them were free [which were included in the fees], except statistical analysis. And yeah, the library, I think, is by far my favourite. Also, my classmates were excellent and talented, with many ideas. Overall, it’s been great.

7. Do you have any advice for our doctoral colleagues?

Never give up— just keep going. You will get there one day. For international students, it’s important to be independent, practise your English, work on yourself, and understand your topic well.

8. How did you cope with the Covid period during your doctoral journey?

I was staying with my landlady in London. Sometimes, I felt lonely, but I could manage it most of the time. I was very calm at that time and focused on what I needed to do, so the quality of my writing actually improved. My landlady and her friends helped me a lot in terms of coping with cultural differences. They helped me correct my English for free, which was brilliant. I was grateful for their support.

9. How's everything with you in Jiangsu, China?

I’m living with my parents-in-law, where there is a nice lake and a beautiful view. The biggest challenge is the food because I'm from Hunan Province. We love spicy food. But people here [in Jiangsu] like sweet food. So, I struggled at the beginning. And now I feel much better. Hopefully, the baby will be born in a healthy condition. I’ll then start looking for a job in a few months.

Upcoming Research Seminar

Please pencil in our next research seminar on Zoom, which will be held on Wednesday, 20th March 2024, from 11-1 pm. More details soon!

Contact Us

Visit us on the website at http://www.imerc.org

Professor Graham Welch: graham.welch@ucl.ac.uk 

Professor Evangelos Himonides: e.himonides@ucl.ac.uk 

Ms Eunice Tang: eunice.tang@ucl.ac.uk

Monday, February 5, 2024

Fwd: [DMRN-LIST] [CfP] 5th International Symposium on the Internet of Sounds - Erlangen, Germany, Sep 30-Oct 2 2024

5th International Symposium on the Internet of Sounds

International Audio Laboratories Erlangen 

30 September - 2 October 2024

https://internetofsounds.net/is2_2024/

 

We are pleased to invite you to the 5th International Symposium on the Internet of Sounds (IS2 2024). The Internet of Sounds is an emerging research field at the intersection of the Sound and Music Computing and the Internet of Things domains. 

The symposium will be hosted at the International Audio Laboratories Erlangen, Germany, a joint institution of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits IIS.

The aim is to bring together academics and industry to investigate and advance the development of Internet of Sounds technologies by using novel tools and processes. The event will consist of presentations, keynotes, panels, poster presentations, demonstrations, tutorials, music performances, and installations.

Keynote Speakers

The program will include three keynotes:

  • Toon van Waterschoot, KU Leuven
  • Georg Hajdu, Hamburg University of Music and Theatre
  • Hanna Lukashevich, Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Media Technology

Satellite Events

The program will include two satellite events:

 For the topics addressed in each workshop please visit the respective webpages.

Call for Papers and Demos

Topics of interest include and are not limited to:

  • Networked immersive audio for the Internet of Sounds
  • Web Audio for the Internet of Sounds
  • Networked Musical XR
  • Semantic Audio applications for the Internet of Sounds
  • Embedded audio
  • Smart musical instruments
  • Ubiquitous music
  • Networked music performances
  • Participatory live music performances
  • Musical haptics for the Internet of Musical Things
  • Music education applications for the Internet of Musical Things
  • Intelligent music production in Internet of Musical Things contexts
  • Protocols and exchange formats for the Internet of Sounds
  • Ecoacoustics
  • Wireless acoustic sensor networks
  • Privacy and security in acoustic sensor networks
  • Detection and classification of sounds in acoustic sensor networks
  • Visualization and Sonification of acoustic sensor networks
  • Sonification for Internet of Sounds applications
  • Audio datasets for Deep Learning and Data Mining
  • Challenges in the management and delivery of large audio databases
  • Visualization, access, and indexing of audio databases
  • Cloud-based services for musical and audio applications
  • Improving accessibility and inclusiveness within the Internet of Sounds
  • Sustainability and ethical aspects of the Internet of Sounds
  • Music information retrieval in networked applications

We consider submissions in the form of:

  • Full paper (min 5 pages, max 10 pages)
  • Poster paper (min 2 pages, max 4 pages)
  • Demo proposal (max 2 pages) 

Authors are welcome to submit to all three tracks. We encourage the submission of work in progress as well as more mature work. However, only the contributions of at least 4 pages will be included in the Proceedings to be submitted to IEEE.

Paper Submission

All submissions will be fully, single-blind peer-reviewed. The expected number of pages for contribution should not exceed 10 pages for paper. Authors must follow IEEE ethical and writing guidelines.

LaTeX and Word template: https://www.ieee.org/conferences/publishing/templates.html

Submission portal: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=is22024paper

Call for Internet of Sounds Performances and Installations

We invite submissions that showcase the internet of sounds in performance and sound installations. Proposed works should have a clear connection to the conference and may relate to a technical paper or demo submission. We particularly invite pieces that last 5-12 minutes, however, shorter and longer performance proposals will be considered.

Performances and Installations Submission

A proposal (compiled in a single pdf) should include:

  • One-page project description
  • One-page description of technical requirements
  • Short program notes
  • Artist bio(s)
  • URL to any performance/installation audio or audio-visual documentation (if available).  The documentation link should use streaming-only services, e.g., SoundCloud, Vimeo, YouTube.

Please keep in mind the following when preparing performance and installation submissions:

  • Space requirements: Indicate whether the work would be more suitable for a university environment (hallways, staircases, indoor and outdoor plazas), club, traditional concert stage, gallery, public space, or other venue. For questions regarding equipment and venue descriptions, please contact the Music & Installations Co-chairs
  • Performer(s): List all performers that would need to be involved. Please note that the organizers cannot provide funding to support performers' travel or accommodation.
  • Feasibility: Provide evidence of the feasibility of the performance or installation. Include documentation and list of previous performances of the submitted or related work that demonstrate the submitter's capacity to implement the proposal.

Submission portal: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=is22024music

Important Dates

  • All submission deadlines:    July 10, 2024
  • Author notification:             August 15, 2024
  • Camera-ready due:              September 9, 2024
  • Early registration deadline: August 26, 2024
  • Late registration deadline: September 23, 2024
  • Symposium dates:                September 30 – Oct 2, 2024

Awards

The Organizing Committee will select the winners for the Best Paper, Best Student Paper, and Best Demo awards. To be eligible for the Best Student Paper award, the presenting and first author of the paper must be a full-time student.

Organizing Committee

  • Local Chair: Nils Peters – International Audio Laboratories Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • Paper Co-chair: Jakob Abeßer – Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Media Technology IDMT
  • Paper Co-chair: Joseph Malloch – Dalhousie University
  • Music & Installations Co-chair: Esther Fee Feichtner – University of Music and Performing Arts Munich
  • Music & Installations Co-chair: Marlon Schumacher – Institute for Music informatics and Musicology Karlsruhe
  • Demo Chair: Robert Hupke – Sennheiser
  • Diversity Chair: Claudia Rinaldi – University of L'Aquila
  • Industry Liaison Chair: Jan Dürre – Sennheiser
  • Communication Chair: Birgit Popp – Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits IIS
  • Web Chair: Alberto Boem – University of Trento
  • Facility Chair: Stefan Turowski – International Audio Laboratories Erlangen, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • General Chair: Luca Turchet – University of Trento

General Contact

Enquiries can be addressed to conference-is2-2024@fau.de

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Luca Turchet, Ph.D.
Associate Professor



Founder and President of the Internet of Sounds Research Network

Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science
University of Trento
Via Sommarive 9 - 38123 Trento - Italy

Tel: +39 0461 283792


Sunday, February 4, 2024

Fwd: Call for Papers: TISMIR Special Collection on Multi-Modal Music Information Retrieval

Dear list,

we are happy to announce the Call for Papers for
TISMIR Special Collection on Multi-Modal Music Information Retrieval.

Deadline for Submissions
01.08.2024

Scope of the Special Collection
Data related to and associated with music can be retrieved from a variety of sources or modalities:
audio tracks; digital scores; lyrics; video clips and concert recordings; artist photos and album covers;
expert annotations and reviews; listener social tags from the Internet; and so on. Essentially, the ways
humans deal with music are very diverse: we listen to it, read reviews, ask friends for
recommendations, enjoy visual performances during concerts, dance and perform rituals, play
musical instruments, or rearrange scores.

As such, it is hardly surprising that we have discovered multi-modal data to be so effective in a range
of technical tasks that model human experience and expertise. Former studies have already
confirmed that music classification scenarios may significantly benefit when several modalities are
taken into account. Other works focused on cross-modal analysis, e.g., generating a missing modality
from existing ones or aligning the information between different modalities.

The current upswing of disruptive artificial intelligence technologies, deep learning, and big data
analytics is quickly changing the world we are living in, and inevitably impacts MIR research as well.
Facilitating the ability to learn from very diverse data sources by means of these powerful approaches
may not only bring the solutions to related applications to new levels of quality, robustness, and
efficiency, but will also help to demonstrate and enhance the breadth and interconnected nature of
music science research and the understanding of relationships between different kinds of musical
data.

In this special collection, we invite papers on multi-modal systems in all their diversity. We particularly
encourage under-explored repertoire, new connections between fields, and novel research areas.
Contributions consisting of pure algorithmic improvements, empirical studies, theoretical discussions,
surveys, guidelines for future research, and introductions of new data sets are all welcome, as the
special collection will not only address multi-modal MIR, but also cover multi-perspective ideas,
developments, and opinions from diverse scientific communities.

Sample Possible Topics
● State-of-the-art music classification or regression systems which are based on several
modalities
● Deeper analysis of correlation between distinct modalities and features derived from them
● Presentation of new multi-modal data sets, including the possibility of formal analysis and
theoretical discussion of practices for constructing better data sets in future
● Cross-modal analysis, e.g., with the goal of predicting a modality from another one
● Creative and generative AI systems which produce multiple modalities
● Explicit analysis of individual drawbacks and advantages of modalities for specific MIR tasks
● Approaches for training set selection and augmentation techniques for multi-modal classifier
systems
● Applying transfer learning, large language models, and neural architecture search to
multi-modal contexts
● Multi-modal perception, cognition, or neuroscience research
● Multi-objective evaluation of multi-modal MIR systems, e.g., not only focusing on the quality,
but also on robustness, interpretability, or reduction of the environmental impact during the
training of deep neural networks

Guest Editors
● Igor Vatolkin (lead) - Akademischer Rat (Assistant Professor) at the Department of Computer
Science, RWTH Aachen University, Germany
● Mark Gotham - Assistant professor at the Department of Computer Science, Durham
University, UK
● Xiao Hu - Associated professor at the University of Hong Kong
● Cory McKay - Professor of music and humanities at Marianopolis College, Canada
● Rui Pedro Paiva - Professor at the Department of Informatics Engineering of the University of
Coimbra, Portugal

Submission Guidelines
Please, submit through https://transactions.ismir.net, and note in your cover letter that your paper is
intended to be part of this Special Collection on Multi-Modal MIR.
Submissions should adhere to formatting guidelines of the TISMIR journal:
https://transactions.ismir.net/about/submissions/. Specifically, articles must not be longer than
8,000 words in length, including referencing, citation and notes.

Please also note that if the paper extends or combines the authors' previously published research, it
is expected that there is a significant novel contribution in the submission (as a rule of thumb, we
would expect at least 50% of the underlying work - the ideas, concepts, methods, results, analysis and
discussion - to be new).

In case you are considering submitting to this special issue, it would greatly help our planning if you
let us know by replying to igor.vatolkin@rwth-aachen.de.

Kind regards,
Igor Vatolkin
on behalf of the TISMIR editorial board and the guest editors

--   Dr. Igor Vatolkin  Akademischer Rat  Department of Computer Science  Chair for AI Methodology (AIM)  RWTH Aachen University  Theaterstrasse 35-39, 52062 Aachen  Mail: igor.vatolkin@rwth-aachen.de  Skype: igor.vatolkin  https://www.aim.rwth-aachen.de  https://sig-ma.de  https://de.linkedin.com/in/igor-vatolkin-881aa78  https://scholar.google.de/citations?user=p3LkVhcAAAAJ  https://ls11-www.cs.tu-dortmund.de/staff/vatolkin

Fwd: DC Online Resources of IFORS

As our material progresses, this is just a reminder every now and then.           

To access information regarding IFORS Developing Countries resources, its regular updates – and to submit your possible "free" (not copyright protected) material, you may occasionally visit the link:   


With this open online resources page we aim to provide a platform to make research and applications of OR widely accessible to the entire OR community including researchers, academicians and scholars in the Developing Countries (DCs).     


For this purpose we invite scholarly contributions spanning across all areas and sectors ranging from arts and science, to communication and education. 


The International Federation of Operational Research Societies (IFORS) is an almost 60-year-old organization which is currently composed of 51 national societies. Regional Groups of IFORS are: ALIO (The Latin American Ibero Association on Operations Research), APORS (The Association of Asian-Pacific Operational Research Societies), EURO (The Association of European Operational Research Societies), NORAM (The Association of North American Operations Research Societies). IFORS conferences are held every three years. The conference IFORS 2023 was held very successfully in Santiago, Chile, during July 10-14, 2023; the next exciting conference IFORS 2026 will take place in Vienna, Austria, during July 12-17, 2026.


Please visit the following link for details regarding the same:

https://www.ifors2026.at/home/


Thank you very much for your attention. We look forward to your enthusiastic participation and scholarly contributions.

Thursday, February 1, 2024

new publication: The Impact of Three Key Paradigm Shifts on Disability, Inclusion, and Autism in Higher Education in England: An Integrative Review


Tang, E.S.Y.; Griffiths, A.; Welch, G.F. The Impact of Three Key Paradigm Shifts on Disability, Inclusion, and Autism in Higher Education in England: An Integrative Review. Trends High. Educ. 2024, 3, 122-141. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3010007

Abstract

In the past two decades, students have been more willing to disclose their disability status when entering higher education (HE) in the United Kingdom (UK). Concurrently, higher education institutions (HEIs) have adopted disability policies and service teams for enhancing equality, diversity, and inclusion in the UK. The purpose of this integrative review is to understand the basis of these trends. The article suggests that there have been three major key paradigm shifts that underpin this cultural change. (1) There was a paradigm shift in terms of changing the dominant models for conceptualising disability from a medical model of disability to a social model of disability and to an affirmative model of disability, together with a debate and policy development demonstrating a concern for greater social inclusion and exclusion; (2) with a massive increase in students entering HE and the rising importance of league tables and ranking systems, universities experienced a paradigm shift from teacher-centred learning (TCL) to inclusive student-centred learning and teaching (SCLT); and (3) the increase in autism disclosure in HE signifies a shift in a conceptualisation of autism from a disorder to a disability and an example of neurodiversity.

Friday, January 26, 2024

Fwd: Airea Journal - call for abstracts - AI in creative practice: ethics and aesthetics



Airea Journal - call for abstracts - AI in creative practice: ethics and aesthetics

The Airea Journal of interdisciplinary creative practice (http://journals.ed.ac.uk/airea/) is seeking abstracts for the following call. As covered below, we are interested in work that investigates the ethical and aesthetic implications of the tech on contemporary arts practice, as well as the broader implications of AI on cultural production. We would particularly welcome contributions that address the issue from the perspectives of computer music, sound art, musical cybernetics, music information retrieval and musicology (as well as any other topic that resonates with the call below), so please do submit (info below) or get in touch (airea@ed.ac.uk) if you have an idea for a paper.

Submission and contact information below. Deadline for 300 word abstracts is March 31st 2024.



Artificial Intelligence in Interdisciplinary Creative Practice: Ethics and Aesthetics

Given the pace of technological development, it can be difficult to track how artificial intelligence is currently shaping creative practice. AI systems are produced and refined at unprecedented rates, with the mass adoption of large language models such as ChatGPT putting pressure on policymakers and technologists to try and curb the impacts that these tools will have upon society. While the challenge of finely predicting AI's cultural impact still remains, we can readily identify a number of differing viewpoints on AI as an emerging cultural presence. Some of these are positive, with artists developing new works, approaches and techniques that utilise AI. Others are less so, as there is a growing range of legitimate artistic concerns around the technology, particularly from environmental, ethical, economic, philosophical and practical perspectives. Given the diverse spread of opinion here, we want to use this issue to platform a variety of different stances that emerge across this spectrum. We wish to foreground both theoretical and practical work that is helping to lead us to a better understanding of this condition. 

We are interested in this topic from ethical and aesthetic standpoints. There is already a rich discourse around the ethics of AI in society and culture, and we are particularly interested in reading the work of researchers who explore these ideas with specific relation to interdisciplinary creative practice. As AI systems are set to work in human life, making autonomous decisions about changes that can be made to their environment, it is important to ask whose values and interests these tools represent. How can we encourage an AI-inflected arts culture that supports the values of artists and audiences, rather than those of policymakers, technologists and commerce? Moreover, from an aesthetic perspective, what creative opportunities are made possible by these systems? Can we understand artistic adoptions of AI as leading towards an influx of new creative ideas, practices, works, scenes, institutions and cultures, or are we more likely to encounter a combinatorial rehashing of things that we already know? Is there a new aesthetic push to be made? In this regard, we are much more interested in foregrounding the generative (or destructive) aesthetic features of AI systems, as opposed to simply documenting new technological approaches or proofs of concept.

Given the exploratory nature of the call, we remain open to a wide range of approaches and suggestions. We wish to read work that surprises us, as well as pieces that attempt to answer the following questions:

    - How is AI different to artists and technologists?

    - Where is the threshold between human and computational creativity?

    - In what ways are pre-trained models functionally derivative? What is the difference between copying and taking influence?

    - How 'in the loop' do humans have to be for AI systems to produce novel creative output? Where do these boundaries emerge between the roles of software and artist?

    - What economic arguments can be made for or against AI-driven content creation? When do we worry about computers stealing jobs from artists and designers?

    - What, if any, are the general aesthetic features of AI in creative practice?

    - How does AI relate to artistic social life: to collaboration, scene and institution?

    - What are the differences between collaborating with humans and machines?

    - What affordances – practical, social, theoretical, material – does AI open up or elide?

    - Why are these debates so often focused on visual culture (text and image)?

    - What different conceptions of 'ethics' (e.g. work ethics, legal ethics, moral frameworks, etc.) are needed to write cogently around this debate?

    - To what extent can artists use AI to propagate their own values, as opposed to those of technologists and policymakers?

    - Does art occur in perception, computation or material?

    - With technical practice developing so quickly, how can theory keep track?



To be considered for this issue, please submit an abstract of 300 words along with author name(s), institutional affiliations, and contact details by 31st March 2024.



Submission instructions:

Register on http://journals.ed.ac.uk/airea and submit abstracts via the Open Journal System (OJS)

Journal policies: http://journals.ed.ac.uk/airea/about/policies



Editorial information:

Editors:

Dr Jack Walker, PhD in Creative Music Practice, University of Edinburgh

Dr Eleni-Ira Panourgia, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Film University Babelsberg Konrad Wolf

Dr Katerina Talianni, Teaching Fellow in Performative and Digital Arts, University of the Peloponnese

For general enquiries about the call please contact airea@ed.ac.uk



This call for papers was published on 15 January 2024

Fwd: Call for papers: Creative Partners? Repositioning the Arts in Transdisciplinary Collaborations


I would like to draw your attention to a panel on the role of the arts in transdisciplinary projects at the 4S/EASST conference 16 - 19 July, 2024 in Amsterdam organised by colleagues and myself. We would be grateful if you could circulate this CfP to potentially interested colleagues, artists, and designers in your networks. The call closes on 12 February, 2024. More information is available under https://www.easst4s2024.net/.

Creative Partners? Repositioning the Arts in Transdisciplinary Collaborations

Veerle Spronck, Peter Peters, Denise Petzold

Recently, transdisciplinary collaborations play an important role in research on societal transformations and processes. Examples are the rise of generative AI (Faisal, 2023) or issues of sustainability and climate change (Rödder, 2016). These transdisciplinary projects often promise to address societal challenges by creating more 'robust' and democratic knowledge, for example through alternative modes of knowledge production that bring researchers and societal actors together (Schikowitz, 2020). Given the range of scholarly disciplines and (societal) stakeholders involved, however, tensions, difficulties, and conflicts are inevitable (Felt, Igelsböck, Schikowitz, & Völker, 2016). While scholars in Science and Technology Studies (STS) can explain how these problems emerge and play out, the aim of synthesizing different bodies of knowledge and solving such conflicts and tensions remains.

In such transdisciplinary collaborations, the arts are often seen as "creative partners" for cooperation. They are for example expected to facilitate the communication between societal stakeholders, or act as vehicles for social critique or commentary. In this panel, we propose to see the arts not as "instrument" or "creative solution-producer". Rather, we ask how the arts can inspire transdisciplinary practice, proposing that the arts are at the core of the very societal transitions that transdisciplinary collaborations seek to address. We re-attend to the arts as practices that can interrupt, distract, deviate, slow down, create discomfort, interrogate, problematise, and confront. By doing so, we critically address the conflict-solving approach that STS scholars have attached to transdisciplinary projects.

In this combined open panel, we therefore not only invite papers, we explicitly invite artists, (social) designers, musicians, writers, and artistic researchers to share their proposals for workshops, experiments, prototypes, performances, or other artistic inventions too. Together, we aim to explore methods, ways of attending, and collaborative work practices that can inspire STS researchers to rethink the position of the arts in transdisciplinary projects.