Friday, January 26, 2024

Fwd: Airea Journal - call for abstracts - AI in creative practice: ethics and aesthetics



Airea Journal - call for abstracts - AI in creative practice: ethics and aesthetics

The Airea Journal of interdisciplinary creative practice (http://journals.ed.ac.uk/airea/) is seeking abstracts for the following call. As covered below, we are interested in work that investigates the ethical and aesthetic implications of the tech on contemporary arts practice, as well as the broader implications of AI on cultural production. We would particularly welcome contributions that address the issue from the perspectives of computer music, sound art, musical cybernetics, music information retrieval and musicology (as well as any other topic that resonates with the call below), so please do submit (info below) or get in touch (airea@ed.ac.uk) if you have an idea for a paper.

Submission and contact information below. Deadline for 300 word abstracts is March 31st 2024.



Artificial Intelligence in Interdisciplinary Creative Practice: Ethics and Aesthetics

Given the pace of technological development, it can be difficult to track how artificial intelligence is currently shaping creative practice. AI systems are produced and refined at unprecedented rates, with the mass adoption of large language models such as ChatGPT putting pressure on policymakers and technologists to try and curb the impacts that these tools will have upon society. While the challenge of finely predicting AI's cultural impact still remains, we can readily identify a number of differing viewpoints on AI as an emerging cultural presence. Some of these are positive, with artists developing new works, approaches and techniques that utilise AI. Others are less so, as there is a growing range of legitimate artistic concerns around the technology, particularly from environmental, ethical, economic, philosophical and practical perspectives. Given the diverse spread of opinion here, we want to use this issue to platform a variety of different stances that emerge across this spectrum. We wish to foreground both theoretical and practical work that is helping to lead us to a better understanding of this condition. 

We are interested in this topic from ethical and aesthetic standpoints. There is already a rich discourse around the ethics of AI in society and culture, and we are particularly interested in reading the work of researchers who explore these ideas with specific relation to interdisciplinary creative practice. As AI systems are set to work in human life, making autonomous decisions about changes that can be made to their environment, it is important to ask whose values and interests these tools represent. How can we encourage an AI-inflected arts culture that supports the values of artists and audiences, rather than those of policymakers, technologists and commerce? Moreover, from an aesthetic perspective, what creative opportunities are made possible by these systems? Can we understand artistic adoptions of AI as leading towards an influx of new creative ideas, practices, works, scenes, institutions and cultures, or are we more likely to encounter a combinatorial rehashing of things that we already know? Is there a new aesthetic push to be made? In this regard, we are much more interested in foregrounding the generative (or destructive) aesthetic features of AI systems, as opposed to simply documenting new technological approaches or proofs of concept.

Given the exploratory nature of the call, we remain open to a wide range of approaches and suggestions. We wish to read work that surprises us, as well as pieces that attempt to answer the following questions:

    - How is AI different to artists and technologists?

    - Where is the threshold between human and computational creativity?

    - In what ways are pre-trained models functionally derivative? What is the difference between copying and taking influence?

    - How 'in the loop' do humans have to be for AI systems to produce novel creative output? Where do these boundaries emerge between the roles of software and artist?

    - What economic arguments can be made for or against AI-driven content creation? When do we worry about computers stealing jobs from artists and designers?

    - What, if any, are the general aesthetic features of AI in creative practice?

    - How does AI relate to artistic social life: to collaboration, scene and institution?

    - What are the differences between collaborating with humans and machines?

    - What affordances – practical, social, theoretical, material – does AI open up or elide?

    - Why are these debates so often focused on visual culture (text and image)?

    - What different conceptions of 'ethics' (e.g. work ethics, legal ethics, moral frameworks, etc.) are needed to write cogently around this debate?

    - To what extent can artists use AI to propagate their own values, as opposed to those of technologists and policymakers?

    - Does art occur in perception, computation or material?

    - With technical practice developing so quickly, how can theory keep track?



To be considered for this issue, please submit an abstract of 300 words along with author name(s), institutional affiliations, and contact details by 31st March 2024.



Submission instructions:

Register on http://journals.ed.ac.uk/airea and submit abstracts via the Open Journal System (OJS)

Journal policies: http://journals.ed.ac.uk/airea/about/policies



Editorial information:

Editors:

Dr Jack Walker, PhD in Creative Music Practice, University of Edinburgh

Dr Eleni-Ira Panourgia, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Film University Babelsberg Konrad Wolf

Dr Katerina Talianni, Teaching Fellow in Performative and Digital Arts, University of the Peloponnese

For general enquiries about the call please contact airea@ed.ac.uk



This call for papers was published on 15 January 2024

Fwd: Call for papers: Creative Partners? Repositioning the Arts in Transdisciplinary Collaborations


I would like to draw your attention to a panel on the role of the arts in transdisciplinary projects at the 4S/EASST conference 16 - 19 July, 2024 in Amsterdam organised by colleagues and myself. We would be grateful if you could circulate this CfP to potentially interested colleagues, artists, and designers in your networks. The call closes on 12 February, 2024. More information is available under https://www.easst4s2024.net/.

Creative Partners? Repositioning the Arts in Transdisciplinary Collaborations

Veerle Spronck, Peter Peters, Denise Petzold

Recently, transdisciplinary collaborations play an important role in research on societal transformations and processes. Examples are the rise of generative AI (Faisal, 2023) or issues of sustainability and climate change (Rödder, 2016). These transdisciplinary projects often promise to address societal challenges by creating more 'robust' and democratic knowledge, for example through alternative modes of knowledge production that bring researchers and societal actors together (Schikowitz, 2020). Given the range of scholarly disciplines and (societal) stakeholders involved, however, tensions, difficulties, and conflicts are inevitable (Felt, Igelsböck, Schikowitz, & Völker, 2016). While scholars in Science and Technology Studies (STS) can explain how these problems emerge and play out, the aim of synthesizing different bodies of knowledge and solving such conflicts and tensions remains.

In such transdisciplinary collaborations, the arts are often seen as "creative partners" for cooperation. They are for example expected to facilitate the communication between societal stakeholders, or act as vehicles for social critique or commentary. In this panel, we propose to see the arts not as "instrument" or "creative solution-producer". Rather, we ask how the arts can inspire transdisciplinary practice, proposing that the arts are at the core of the very societal transitions that transdisciplinary collaborations seek to address. We re-attend to the arts as practices that can interrupt, distract, deviate, slow down, create discomfort, interrogate, problematise, and confront. By doing so, we critically address the conflict-solving approach that STS scholars have attached to transdisciplinary projects.

In this combined open panel, we therefore not only invite papers, we explicitly invite artists, (social) designers, musicians, writers, and artistic researchers to share their proposals for workshops, experiments, prototypes, performances, or other artistic inventions too. Together, we aim to explore methods, ways of attending, and collaborative work practices that can inspire STS researchers to rethink the position of the arts in transdisciplinary projects.

Thursday, January 25, 2024

Fwd: Extension and Final CfP: 11th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology (DLfM 2024)

** EXTENSION OF DEADLINE: Full and short paper submissions to DLfM are now due on February 22nd.   ** An initial abstract submission with a provisional title and author list remains due on February 12th.    Final CfP: 11th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology (In Association with IAML 2024), June 27, Stellenbosch University Konservatorium, Stellenbosch, South Africa    CALL FOR PAPERS AND POSTERS    DLfM welcomes contributions related to any aspect of digital libraries and musicology, including topics related to musical archiving and retrieval, cataloguing and classification, musical databases, special collections, music encodings and representations, computational musicology, or music information retrieval (MIR).    As this will be the first iteration of DLfM taking place on the African continent, we strongly encourage proposals from individuals working on music in Africa within various disciplines and from a range of perspectives, particularly addressing this year's theme:     Musicology of the Global South: The Role of Digital Libraries    The organizing committee especially encourages submissions of papers and posters that address this theme, however, we welcome all submissions addressing all topics that fall under the scope of DLfM. Specific examples of topics traditionally covered at DLfM can be found at https://dlfm.web.ox.ac.uk.    DLfM 2024 proceedings of full and short papers will be published in the ACM Digital Library through ICPS. We are aware of a growing number of institutional and funder requirements for Open Access publication, and recognise that authors will need to comply with any policies which apply to them. Further advice is available from the ACM at https://www.acm.org/publications/openaccess#h-green-open-access    IMPORTANT DATES (AoE)    * Abstract submission deadline with provisional title and author list: February 12th, 2024  * Paper (full paper and short paper) submission deadline: February 22nd, 2024  * Notification of paper acceptance: April 8th, 2024  * Poster submission deadline: April 22nd, 2024  * Camera-ready submission deadline (full and short papers): May 13th, 2024  * Conference registration deadline: June 17th, 2024  * Conference: June 27th, Stellenbosch, South Africa    Note that at least one author must be registered by the CAMERA-READY submission deadline, May 13th, in order for accepted submissions to be included in the conference programme.    SUBMISSIONS    Paper submissions    * Paper length: We invite full papers (up to 8 pages excluding references) or short papers (up to 4 pages excluding references).  * Submissions: work is submitted to DLfM via EasyChair (https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=dlfm2024).  * Format: Submissions must be in English, formatted according to the appropriate ACM template (see template below), in PDF format, and A4 size. Authors will need to follow ACM's instructions for formatting carefully. Assistance will be provided from the proceedings chair.  * Templates: Authors must use either the LaTeX template (https://portalparts.acm.org/hippo/latex_templates/acmart-primary.zip, use the 'sigconf', 'authordraft', and 'anonymous' settings for initial submission), the LaTeX + Overleaf template (https://www.overleaf.com/latex/templates/association-for-computing-machinery-acm-sig-proceedings-template/bmvfhcdnxfty, use the 'sigconf', 'authordraft', and 'anonymous' settings for initial submission), or the MS Word template (https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/publications/word_style/interim-template-style/interim-layout.docx). Historically, LaTeX versions have been easier to process into camera-ready versions. Therefore, we encourage all authors to use the LaTeX (or LaTeX + Overleaf) template if possible.  * Page limits for submitted papers apply to all text, excluding the bibliography (i.e., references can be included on pages over the specified limits).    Poster submissions    * Submission: The initial poster submission consists of an abstract which outlines both the scholarly content and broad details of the proposed layout in 500 words or fewer. This is to be sent by e-mail to dlfm2024@easychair.org   * Format: Information on printed poster formats will be provided on acceptance of the poster abstract. All accepted posters will also be required to submit a digital copy before the conference date to be shared publicly on the conference web page.    Review and Ethics    Papers (long and short) will be double blind peer reviewed by at least 3 members of the programme committee. For accepted paper submissions, at least one author must register for the conference (as a presenter) by the camera-ready submission deadline, May 13th, 2024.    DLfM conforms to the usual conventions for publication ethics. For instance, we endeavour to provide an effective reviewing process that is fair to all submissions, with reviews from experts in the subject area. In turn, we expect authors to ensure anonymity in the original submission as far as practically possible, (for instance by not uploading the submission to public website and/or removing any currently public unpublished preprints while it is under review) and that submissions to DLfM are not under active consideration by another conference or journal.    Submission link: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=dlfm2024  Contact email: dlfm2024@easychair.org    CONFERENCE ORGANIZATION    Programme Chair  David M. Weigl, mdw - University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna    General Chair  Martha E. Thomae, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa    Proceedings and Publicity Chair  Anna Plaksin, Paderborn University    Local Chair  Beulah Gericke-Geldenhuys, Stellenbosch University    Programme Committee  Claire Arthur, Georgia Institute of Technology  David Bainbridge, University of Waikato  Houman Behzadi, McGill University  J. A. Burgoyne, University of Amsterdam  Joy Calico, UCLA Herb Alpert School of Music  Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza, University of Alicante  Rafael Caro Repetto, Institute for Ethnomusicology, Kunstuniversität Graz  Kahyun Choi, Indiana University Bloomington  Nathaniel Condit-Schultz, Georgia Institute of Technology  Rachel Cowgill, University of York  Elsa De Luca, CESEM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa  Jürgen Diet, Bavarian State Library  Benjamin Fields, BBC  Ichiro Fujinaga, McGill University  Francesca Giannetti, Rutgers University  Mark Gotham, Durham University  Jose M. Iñesta, Universidad de Alicante  Charles Inskip, University College London  Audrey Laplante, EBSI, Université de Montréal  Kjell Lemström, University of Helsinki  David Lewis, Goldsmiths, University of London  Ewa Lukasik, Poznan University of Technology, Institute of Computing Science  Cory Mckay, Marianopolis College  Stefan Münnich, University of Basel  Joshua Neumann, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz  Kevin Page, University of Oxford  Laurent Pugin, RISM Digital Center  Andreas Rauber, Vienna University of Technology  Xavier Serra, Universitat Pompeu Fabra  Sandra Tuppen, British Library  Marnix van Berchum, Utrecht University  Raffaele Viglianti, University of Maryland  Sonia Wronkowska, The National Library of Poland

Monday, January 15, 2024

iMerc Newsletter — Vol. 4, January 2024

About us


Since the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020, we have been meeting regularly to share new research and insights related to diverse topics in music education, broadly conceived. We are a group of researchers at doctoral and post-doctoral levels, as well as senior researchers, with a shared curiosity and interest in advancing basic and applied research. Our monthly seminars are also designed to foster a sense of community amongst colleagues who are based in the UK, mainland Europe (Portugal, Germany, Greece), Asia (China, including Hong Kong) and Australia. Opportunity is taken each month to update current research projects and also to listen to the latest research from our invited speakers. If you would like to know more or to join us, please contact us.

 

Our upcoming research seminar is on Wednesday, 24th January 2024, 11.00-13.00 UK Time. This will be held on Zoom and in room 938 at the IOE. We are very happy to have Dr. Jeehye Hwang, Dr. Gregory Boardman, and Alice Bowmer speak to us. Please join by contacting Eunice (email below). Everyone is welcome!

In This Issue



      Previous iMerc Research Seminar, November 2023

      Newly Published: The Oxford Handbook of Early Childhood Learning and Music, November 2023

      End-of-year Gatherings, December 2023

      iMerc Research Seminar, January 2024

      In Conversation with Dr. Jeehye Hwang, January 2024

      Upcoming Research Seminar, February 2024

      Contact us

Previous iMerc Research Seminar, November 2023



1 - Presentation cover slide presented by Professor Ian Cross

Our guest speaker, Professor Ian Cross (ic108@cam.ac.uk), introduced the Score Design project at the Centre for Music & Science, Faculty of Music, University of Cambridge. The project explores ways in which conventional Western musical notation can be minimally adapted so as to suit it better for the functions that it presently fulfils. Ian guided us to explore ways in which conventional notation can be tweaked to make it work better when musicians use it to help them perform. Ian also shared bits of how the team was embarking on a range of experiments and clarified which types and degrees of modification were likely to be most effective for different musical purposes and contexts.

Dr. Elizabeth Haddon (liz.haddon@york.ac.uk), our guest speaker, shared her recent study, Iran Piano School: community, pedagogy and remote researching. Despite the daily challenges relating to politics, religious beliefs, resource mobility, conflict and communication, it is evidenced that through the engagement of around 400 students of varied ages, working with around 25 teachers, the piano school Liz worked with appears to be flourishing. Drawing on qualitative data from interviews and questionnaire data from the school's leaders, its piano, theory and solfeggio teachers, and from questionnaire responses from pupils and their parents, Liz guided us to understand and learn from this study, while exploring the pedagogical practices and understandings of community arising within this specific case.



2 - Presentation cover slide presented by Dr. Elizabeth Haddon

Newly published: The Oxford Handbook of Early Childhood Learning and Development in Music, November 2023



Margaret S. Barrett (ed.), Graham F. Welch (ed.)

Published: 15 November 2023

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190927523.001.0001

Online ISBN: 9780190927554 

Print ISBN: 9780190927523 

Publisher: Oxford University Press

 

Abstract

Investigation of the role of music in early life and learning has been somewhat fragmented, with studies being undertaken within a range of fields with little apparent conversation across disciplinary boundaries, and with an emphasis on pre-schoolers' and school-aged childrens' learning and engagement. The Oxford Handbook of Early Childhood Learning and Development in Music brings together leading researchers in infant and early childhood cognition, music education, music therapy, neuroscience, cultural and developmental psychology, and music sociology to interrogate questions of how our capacity for music develops from birth, and its contributions to learning and development. Researchers in cultural psychology and sociology of musical childhoods investigate those factors that shape children's musical learning and development and the places and spaces in which children encounter and engage with music. These issues are complemented with consideration of the policy environment at local, national and global levels in relation to music early learning and development and the ways in which these shape young children's music experiences and opportunities. The volume also explores issues of music provision and developmental contributions for children with Special Education Needs, children living in medical settings and participating in music therapy, and those living in sites of trauma and conflict. Consideration of these environments provides a context to examine music learning and development in family, community and school settings including general and specialized school environments. Authors trace the trajectories of development within and across cultures and settings and in that process identify those factors that facilitate or constrain children's early music learning and development.

End-of-year Gatherings, December 2023



3 - Online Gathering Front Slide



4 - In-Person Gathering Poster



5 - Front (Left to Right): Dan Wang, Shike Guo, Pak Hang Wan; Back (Left to Right): Eunice Tang, Yunjie Wang



6 - Crisps, cookies, and dips (Yunjie), Crisps (Shike), Lemon cheesecake (Pak), Banana cake (Eunice)

iMerc Research Seminar, January 2024



7 - Speaker: Dr. Jeehye Hwang

Speaker: Dr. Jeehye Hwang

Topic: How do older adults perceive and engage in active music-making in the digital age? - Exploring lived experiences of instrumental learning and playing after retirement in South Korea

Dr. Jeehye Hwang (jeehye.hwang.18@alumni.ucl.ac.uk)

Jeehye completed her undergraduate degree (B.A.) in instrumental music performance at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA, where she specialised in violin. She completed her M.A. in music therapy at New York University, USA and music education at Kingston University London, UK. In 2023, Jeehye completed her PhD in music education at University College London, Institute of Education. Her doctoral research focuses on exploring older adults' lived experiences in instrumental music learning in the digital age. Jeehye worked as a music tutor and a music therapist in community centres, children's hospitals, and local social welfare agencies in South Korea. At UCL, Jeehye worked as a Postgraduate Teaching Assistant for the M.A. in Music Education (2020-2021). She is an Associate Fellow (AFHEA). 

Jeehye was awarded Grand Challenges Doctoral Students' Small Grants from UCL. She conducted an interdisciplinary project called 'Creatively Connected: Investigating the Impact of Creative Arts-based Online Support Groups for University Students with Disabilities in South Korea during the COVID-19 Pandemic'. She has presented her research works at poster conferences at UCL (2020, 2021) and conferences and seminars in Germany and the U.K. 

Jeehye's Abstract

The ageing population has prompted a shift in the understanding of ageing, with studies emphasising the advantages of musical engagement in later life (Hallam & Creech, 2016). While the literature has explored singing and listening to music (Petrovsky et al., 2020; Wattanasoei, 2017), there is a paucity of research on playing instruments in older adulthood. Additionally, the advent of digital technologies has introduced new ways of experiencing music (Creech, 2019), yet the coordination and comprehension of digital music technology use among older adults remain unexplored.

This presentation discusses my doctoral research, which explores the nuances and subjective experiences of learning and playing musical instruments and using digital music technology among retired older adults in the current digitalisation phase. The research involved ten retired older adults learning musical instruments at community centres in South Korea. In-depth semi-structured interviews with artefact elicitations were conducted, and the data were analysed using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), shedding light on the complexities of their musical experiences and implications for post-retirement life.

Key findings highlight the significance of contextual and personal factors in learning and playing musical instruments post-retirement. Motivations for musical engagement intersected with life transitions associated with retiring from full-time work, demonstrating a desire for social and emotional benefits during this period. Also, digital music technologies, including online platforms like YouTube and music-related smartphone applications, were integrated into music practices, with participants valuing them as accessible tools for autonomous learning. Finally, the findings suggest that learning and playing musical instruments is a meaningful form of community participation after retirement, fostering personal development and social connectedness.

Overall, my doctoral research highlights the importance of meaningful music participation in the lives of retired older adults, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of ageing and challenging societal perceptions.

 

References

Creech, A. (2019). Using music technology creatively to enrich later-life: A literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00117

Hallam, S., & Creech, A. (2016). Can active music-making promote health and well-being in older citizens? Findings of the music for life project. London Journal of Primary Care, 8(2), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2016.1152099

Hwang, J. (2023). How do older adults perceive and engage in active music-making in the digital age? Exploring lived experiences of instrumental learning and playing after retirement in South Korea [Doctoral, UCL (University College London)]. In Doctoral thesis, UCL (University College London). https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10181032/

Petrovsky, D. V., Sefcik, J. S., & Cacchione, P. Z. (2020). A qualitative exploration of choral singing in community-dwelling older adults. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 42(5), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919861380

Wattanasoei, S., Binson, B., Kumar, R., Somrongthong, R., & Kanchanakhan, N. (2017). Quality of life through listening music among elderly people in semi-urban area, Thailand. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 29(1), 21–25.

Speaker: Dr. Gregory Boardman

Topic: Musical meaning-making in the later stages of primary education



8 - Speaker: Dr. Gregory Boardman

Dr. Gregory Boardman (gregory.boardman.15@ucl.ac.uk)

Completing an MA in Music Education at IOE in 2018, Gregory subsequently registered for a part-time PhD in Music Education in early 2020. Gregory's research aims to explore participation in instrumental music-making, barriers to access and meaning-making in relation to historical, dominant, and progressive models of musical learning.

Originally graduating with a bachelor's degree in music from Durham University, Gregory completed a PhD in Music Composition at Keele University in 2003. Academic study has always been conducted alongside a career as a producer of media content for young people. With multiple nominations from the British Academy of Film and TV Awards (BAFTA) and as a winner of Broadcast, Montecarlo Television Festival and Kidscreen Awards, Gregory is active as a television, music and event producer working with the likes of the BBC, SKY, Channel Four, Channel Five and the British Film Institute. Projects have included titles such as Rastamouse, Apple Tree House and As If. In the past decade, Three Stones Media, the production consultancy co-founded by Gregory, has expanded its interests in screen content to include delivering music education projects in a variety of contexts for several music hubs, the English Chamber Orchestra and The Royal Opera House, Covent Garden.

Gregory's Abstract

Gregory's iMerc presentation provides an update on the progress of his PhD study exploring participation in instrumental music-making, barriers to access and meaning-making in relation to historical, dominant, and progressive models of musical learning.

It was hoped the pilot data collected for his PhD study during 2021 & 2022 might call for only minor modifications to his methodology before embarking on the main body of data gathering for his thesis. However, despite a wealth of valuable data, focus groups conducted as part of the pilot data collection proved to be significant and exerted a pivotal influence on the direction of the research. These data highlighted the need to make a significant adjustment not only to the methodology but to the theoretical frameworks supporting Gregory's approach.

The key research questions remain fundamentally the same. However, reflections on the initial data suggest a need to put more emphasis on 'multimodality' (Kress, 2011) and consideration that the felt musical experience 'resists being put into words' (Gascoigne & Thornton, 2013). Embracing the potential for multimodality in the research methodology has created certain challenges. More importantly, we might ask what are the implications of multimodality on classroom practitioners if words alone fail to capture what might be observed (Elliott & Silverman, 2015).

 

References

Elliott, D. J. & Silverman, M. (2015). Music matters: A philosophy of music education (Second Edition). Oxford University Press.

Gascoigne, N., & Thornton, T. (2013). Tacit knowledge. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315729886

Kress, G. (2011). Discourse Analysis and Education: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Approach. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (Second Edition). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203836149

Speaker: Ms Alice Bowmner

Topic: Supporting infant language development through parental singing



9 - Speaker: Ms Alice Bowmer

Alice Bowmer (abowm001@gold.ac.uk )

Alice is a musician, violin teacher and researcher who began teaching music in 2008 with children aged 6 months – 6 years. Alice now runs a music teaching practice where she works with pupils between 6 - 18 years, as well as supporting community music projects for preschool children. Alice's research evolved from a desire to understand more about how her students were learning, both musically and in other aspects of their development (motor function, language and cognition). Her experience suggests that careful attention to all of these elements is highly effective when helping children to learn new skills.

Alice won an ESRC studentship in 2020 and is currently working on her PhD which examines the links between music and language during infancy with Professor Lauren Stewart at Goldsmiths, University of London.

Alice is an honorary research associate at the UCL Institute of Education and co-founded the research group 'Music and Cognition' with Dr Kathryn Mason. Their current research looks at how music and arts training can impact upon executive functions, speech, language, and communication skills. Alice is eternally grateful to the support of Professor Graham Welch, whom she has worked alongside since 2014.

Alice's Abstract

Speech, language and communication needs for children prior to starting school is a pressing concern in the UK. Approximately 25% of young children have a speech, language and communication need, and most of these persist into adulthood (Cultural Learning Alliance, 2017). Additionally, there is evidence that those from lower socio-economic backgrounds are more at risk from the consequences of not developing their language sufficiently to thrive at school (Nuffield Foundation, 2016).

This talk will summarise an ongoing feasibility study working with parents in two areas of the UK, which aimed to support infant language development via parental singing. The project employed a weekly, multi-group, parent-baby class intervention, which ran for 16-18 weeks. Our main objective was to empirically test whether singing classes supported infant language skills more than similarly designed physical/cognitive classes. Further evidence was collected on parents' use of singing in the home. Alice will share a discussion of her project status and research findings to date.

References

Cultural Learning Alliance. (2017). ImagineNation: The value of cultural learning. http://www.culturallearningalliance.org.uk/news/new-publication-sets-out-the-value-of-arts-education/

Nuffield Foundation. (2016). Early Years Education and Childcare | Nuffield Foundation. http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/early-years-education-and-childcare-0

In Conversation with Dr. Jeehye Hwang, January 2024



10 - The mountain view is one of Jeehye's favourite mountains to visit. It is called Ulsan Rock and is in the province of Kangwon-do, South Korea.



11 - Dr. Jeehye Hwang's family picture with her parents and her brother's family. This was taken a few months ago on her lovely niece's birthday. The left at the back is Jeehye.

Dr. Jeehye Hwang passed her doctoral viva and received her Ph.D. in November 2023. Here is an interview about her doctoral experience.

1. Can you tell us a bit about yourself?

My name is Jeehye Hwang. I am from South Korea. I majored in violin for my undergraduate degree in the US. After finishing my undergraduate degree, I studied music therapy at Graduate School. So, I got my first master's degree in music therapy in the US. Then I came back to Korea. I worked as a music therapist and music tutor, working with children with various disabilities in different settings such as community centers, children's hospitals and social agencies. After some years working as a therapist and a music tutor, I pursued another master's degree in music education in the UK. I began my doctoral study in February 2019 and received my Ph.D. in November 2023.

My doctoral study explored how older adults perceive and engage in learning and playing musical instruments after retirement in the digital age. It's about how they perceive learning musical instruments after their retirement and how they use digital technologies to learn musical instruments. Because South Korea is a country where the use of smartphones and the Internet is prevalent among older adults, I was curious about how they use their digital technology for learning music among older adults. So yeah, this is my educational background in brief.

2. This is great! Can you tell us more about your doctoral experience?

My doctoral study began in February 2019. The first year was about taking courses, research skills courses and doing some volunteer work because I was interested in the older population, older adults. I was volunteering in London, in community centers where older adults participate in various community activities, including music and other leisure activities. I did that for the first year until the upgrade viva in February 2020. I also had a great time with colleagues at IOE.

After the upgrade in February 2020, the pandemic hit. I was in Korea doing a pilot study for two months but couldn't return to London because of the pandemic. I then stayed in South Korea for one and a half years. I had to change the whole research plan because I originally wanted to do a comparative study between the UK and Korea. But I couldn't go back to London. I wanted to do focus groups but couldn't since all community centers were closed. I did interviews with participants only. During that time, I stayed in Korea for data collection and analysis. At the beginning of 2022, I returned to London because of my visa. I spent three months in London and had supervision. After that, I returned to Korea to write my thesis. I have to write the thesis alone here in Korea. It was quite an experience to do a doctoral study during the pandemic. Thankfully, I managed to write up and complete my viva in November 2023.

3. It was indeed quite an experience! What do you enjoy most at the IOE?

I think the IOE is quite a diverse environment. You can meet many people from various backgrounds, not only from music education but also from people from various fields. You can meet people from various fields outside the IOE when you go to the research skills courses. Connecting with people from diverse backgrounds and perspectives was a very valuable opportunity. I also took advantage of taking courses about interviewing people, tips for conducting qualitative and quantitative studies, how you can manage your study time, etc. You can take as many courses as you want, so it was an enriching experience.

"It's important to enjoy the time. I miss staying in the doctoral rooms at the IOE, surrounded by fellow students engaged in discussions about each other's research interests. But because of the pandemic, people had to return to their homes. So my advice is to make the most of your time as it swiftly passes."

4. What would you like to explore if you got a chance to stay longer in London?

If COVID didn't happen, maybe I would do a comparative study because my initial plan was to do a comparative study between Korea and the UK. Also, I would conduct data collection methods like focus groups and observations.

5. You're brilliant at adapting to the situation and being flexible.

Initially, I was frustrated that I was thinking about taking a break like some of my friends did. It was challenging at the beginning because you never know what would happen, whether the pandemic would just disappear or continue… nobody knew. It was frustrating then, but my supervisors were very supportive. We talked a lot online. I would like to thank my two supervisors, Professor Evangelos Himonides and Dr Ross Purves, for being very supportive and flexible. They were very open to my opinion and my circumstances.

6. How did you prepare the doctoral viva? Any tips to share with us?

I was worried at the beginning, but I did mock viva with my supervisors, which was very valuable. After finishing writing your thesis, which is hundreds of pages, you simply cannot remember everything you write. At that time, I was thinking, should I remember everything that I wrote for… how should I prepare? Mock viva helps. Your supervisors are also examiners for other students, so they know what the viva would be. They asked questions that examiners might ask, so responding to them was really helpful.

Also, examiners are not expecting perfect answers for everything. It's not like they ask me a question, and then I must give a definite answer. They sought to understand my expertise and how I engaged with my study. They wanted to engage in a productive dialogue about my research. It is not like they want to find some errors in my research. They were curious about my research and asked why I did it, the rationale behind my research, and so on.

Also, they are the people who approach my work with fresh perspectives. Supervisors are the people who know my work from the beginning. They know the things that I did. But examiners are the people who just read my work and have some fresh perspectives, like things that you haven't thought about before. It was a good opportunity to explore my study from different perspectives and lenses beyond your ingrained knowledge. I think Viva was like another exploration of my work.

When I looked back, my viva was quite long. It was almost three hours online. Overall, it was an excellent opportunity to discuss my research. Examiners were very open to the answers that I provided. It was an excellent dialogue and discussion about my research.

7. Do you have any advice for our doctoral colleagues?

It's important to enjoy the time. I miss staying in the doctoral rooms at the IOE, surrounded by fellow students engaged in discussions about each other's research interests. But because of the pandemic, people had to return to their homes. So my advice is to make the most of your time as it swiftly passes. London, being an international city, offers many experiences beyond your studies. You can take a break during the weekend. Doctoral studies don't have a specific break time, so it's really important to balance focused study periods with specific moments of leisure. Take advantage of your weekends, explore the city, and enjoy London's diverse offerings. A doctoral study is not just about focusing on your studies but also about taking good care of your physical and mental health.

Upcoming Research Seminar, February 2024

Please pencil down our next research seminar on Zoom, which will be held on Wednesday, 21st February 2024, from 11-1 pm. More details soon!

Contact Us

Visit us on the website at http://www.imerc.org

Professor Graham Welch: graham.welch@ucl.ac.uk 

Professor Evangelos Himonides: e.himonides@ucl.ac.uk 

Ms Eunice Tang: eunice.tang@ucl.ac.uk

Friday, January 12, 2024

Fwd: [DMRN-LIST] 2nd CfP: 11th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology (DLfM 2024)



2nd CfP: 11th International Conference on Digital Libraries for
Musicology (In Association with IAML 2024), June 27, Stellenbosch
University Konservatorium, Stellenbosch, South Africa

CALL FOR PAPERS AND POSTERS

DLfM welcomes contributions related to any aspect of digital libraries
and musicology, including topics related to musical archiving and
retrieval, cataloguing and classification, musical databases, special
collections, music encodings and representations, computational
musicology, or music information retrieval (MIR).

As this will be the first iteration of DLfM taking place on the African
continent, we strongly encourage proposals from individuals working on
music in Africa within various disciplines and from a range of
perspectives, particularly addressing this year's theme:

Musicology of the Global South: The Role of Digital Libraries

The organizing committee especially encourages submissions of papers and
posters that address this theme, however, we welcome all submissions
addressing all topics that fall under the scope of DLfM. Specific
examples of topics traditionally covered at DLfM can be found at
https://dlfm.web.ox.ac.uk.

DLfM 2024 proceedings of full and short papers will be published in the
ACM Digital Library through ICPS. We are aware of a growing number of
institutional and funder requirements for Open Access publication, and
recognise that authors will need to comply with any policies which apply
to them. Further advice is available from the ACM at
https://www.acm.org/publications/openaccess#h-green-open-access

IMPORTANT DATES (AoE)

* Paper (full paper and short paper) submission deadline: February 12th,
2024
* Notification of paper acceptance: April 8th, 2024
* Poster submission deadline: April 22nd, 2024
* Camera-ready submission deadline (full and short papers): May 13th, 2024
* Conference registration deadline: June 17th, 2024
* Conference: June 27th, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Note that at least one author must be registered by the conference
registration deadline in order for accepted submissions to be included
in the conference programme.

SUBMISSIONS

Paper submissions

* Paper length: We invite full papers (up to 8 pages excluding
references) or short papers (up to 4 pages excluding references).
* Submissions: work is submitted to DLfM via EasyChair
(https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=dlfm2024).
* Format: Submissions must be in English, formatted according to the
appropriate ACM template (see template below), in PDF format, and A4
size. Authors will need to follow ACM's instructions for formatting
carefully. Assistance will be provided from the proceedings chair.
* Templates: Authors must use either the LaTeX template
(https://portalparts.acm.org/hippo/latex_templates/acmart-primary.zip,
use the 'sigconf', 'authordraft', and 'anonymous' settings for initial
submission), the LaTeX + Overleaf template
(https://www.overleaf.com/latex/templates/association-for-computing-machinery-acm-sig-proceedings-template/bmvfhcdnxfty,
use the 'sigconf', 'authordraft', and 'anonymous' settings for initial
submission), or the MS Word template
(https://www.acm.org/binaries/content/assets/publications/word_style/interim-template-style/interim-layout.docx).
Historically, LaTeX versions have been easier to process into
camera-ready versions. Therefore, we encourage all authors to use the
LaTeX (or LaTeX + Overleaf) template if possible.
* Page limits for submitted papers apply to all text, excluding the
bibliography (i.e., references can be included on pages over the
specified limits).

Poster submissions

* Submission: The initial poster submission consists of an abstract
which outlines both the scholarly content and broad details of the
proposed layout in 500 words or fewer. This is to be sent by e-mail to
dlfm2024@easychair.org
* Format: Information on printed poster formats will be provided on
acceptance of the poster abstract. All accepted posters will also be
required to submit a digital copy before the conference date to be
shared publicly on the conference web page.

Review and Ethics

Papers (long and short) will be double blind peer reviewed by at least 3
members of the programme committee. For accepted paper submissions, at
least one author must register for the conference (as a presenter) by
the conference registration deadline.

DLfM conforms to the usual conventions for publication ethics. For
instance, we endeavour to provide an effective reviewing process that is
fair to all submissions, with reviews from experts in the subject area.
In turn, we expect authors to ensure anonymity in the original
submission as far as practically possible, (for instance by not
uploading the submission to public website and/or removing any currently
public unpublished preprints while it is under review) and that
submissions to DLfM are not under active consideration by another
conference or journal.

Submission link: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=dlfm2024
Contact email: dlfm2024@easychair.org

CONFERENCE ORGANIZATION

Programme Chair
David M. Weigl, mdw - University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna

General Chair
Martha E. Thomae, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa

Proceedings and Publicity Chair
Anna Plaksin, Paderborn University

Local Chair
Beulah Gericke-Geldenhuys, Stellenbosch University

Programme Committee
Claire Arthur, Georgia Institute of Technology
David Bainbridge, University of Waikato
Houman Behzadi, McGill University
J. A. Burgoyne, University of Amsterdam
Joy Calico, UCLA Herb Alpert School of Music
Jorge Calvo-Zaragoza, University of Alicante
Rafael Caro Repetto, Institute for Ethnomusicology, Kunstuniversität Graz
Kahyun Choi, Indiana University Bloomington
Nathaniel Condit-Schultz, Georgia Institute of Technology
Rachel Cowgill, University of York
Elsa De Luca, CESEM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Jürgen Diet, Bavarian State Library
Benjamin Fields, BBC
Ichiro Fujinaga, McGill University
Francesca Giannetti, Rutgers University
Mark Gotham, Durham University
Jose M. Iñesta, Universidad de Alicante
Charles Inskip, University College London
Audrey Laplante, EBSI, Université de Montréal
Kjell Lemström, University of Helsinki
David Lewis, Goldsmiths, University of London
Ewa Lukasik, Poznan University of Technology, Institute of Computing Science
Cory Mckay, Marianopolis College
Stefan Münnich, University of Basel
Joshua Neumann, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz
Kevin Page, University of Oxford
Laurent Pugin, RISM Digital Center
Andreas Rauber, Vienna University of Technology
Xavier Serra, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Sandra Tuppen, British Library
Marnix van Berchum, Utrecht University
Raffaele Viglianti, University of Maryland
Sonia Wronkowska, The National Library of Poland

Fwd: Call for contribution


The Conference on AI and Music Creativity is an annual conference bringing together a community working on the application of AI in music practice. The AI and Music research focus is highly interdisciplinary with topics ranging from performance systems, computational creativity, machine listening, robotics, sonification, and more.

The theme of AIMC 2024 conference - which will take place September 9-11 at Oxford University - is Interconnections between Music AI and other fields, where we are interested in how the Music AI community considers connections and intersections with other fields of research and practice. We encourage authors, composers, performers, and artists to examine the intersection between their work in AI and other fields - see below for indicative topics. We encourage contributions that articulate not only how other fields inform Music AI research and practice, but how Music AI contributes or may contribute to other fields.

Dates

March 10th submission closes

April 1st - notification to authors

September 9 conference opens


All submissions will be created on pubpub.org while the review process will be handled through a conference management systems. Detailed instructions about the process will be available under the Call tab in the conference webpages (link above). Paper submission should be anonymised. This is not required for music or workshop/tutorials submissions.


Papers

Papers are up to 5000 words, not including Abstract, Acknowledgements, Ethics Statement, or References. Please consider the list of indicative topics for the conference. We encourage multimedia embedded in the paper, so pictures, illustrations, videos, sound files and <iframes>. We also encourage links to code repositories. Submitted works should be original, i.e. not published elsewhere or under review. 

Paper submissions should demonstrate rigorous research methodology and will be evaluated according to their novelty, academic quality, appropriateness, importance, readability, ethical standards and paper organisation.

  • Authors names should be excluded from the front matter and in all references (e.g. replace with XXX XXX).

  • Supplementary materials referenced in footnotes and links such as GitHub repositories should be uploaded to an anonymous account. The author's account(s) can be used for the camera ready.

  • Authors can indicate preference for presentation (15 minutes) or poster.


Workshops and Tutorials

We invite proposals for workshops and tutorials. These sessions should be interactive and focus on new technologies, systems or artistic practices. Proposals should specify the number of participants who can be accommodated and the duration (e.g. hour, half day, full day) and indicate the skills, experiences or artefacts that participants will come out with. 

Submission Details:

  • Workshop or Tutorial session title

  • List of contributors 

  • Name/Affiliation and a 150-word biography for each contributor

  • A 800-1000 word (excluding references) description (including an abstract) that should detail

    • Review contextualising the practice field relevant to your work.

    • Methods taken in developing the work

    • The hands-on nature of the workshop/tutorial (e.g. how will this be distinct from a long presentation)

  • A technical rider detailing:

    • Technical equipment you will provide 

    • Technical equipment which you will require

    • Setup details such as tables, space requirements, power, visuals, audio.

    • Proposed duration

    • Any accessibility requirements.

  • Other documentation (web links etc)

Music

Music submissions should relate to AI in either specific or broad terms. This includes, but is by no means limited to:

  • music featuring AI as a creative tool

  • music generated by AI, or using AI performance systems

  • sonification

  • electroacoustic music

  • experimental and improvised music

  • live coding and live electronic music

  • beat-based music

  • Algorave music

  • music exploring computational creativity

  • music exploring machine listening

  • music with or about robotics

  • music adapted from AI

  • music using AI-related instruments

  • music featuring AI-generated text or visuals

  • any other related areas

Music which does not directly use AI but relates to it programmatically or aesthetically, or music which comments on and/or explores new perspectives on AI, is also encouraged.

Submissions will be required to detail how the music relates to AI and the conference theme of Interconnections between Music AI and other fields. They will also be required to provide a technical description of the piece including details such as speaker/microphone setup and electronics processing where appropriate.

Accepted submissions will be programmed at AIMC 2024 in one of three performances:

  • Performance 1, a concert at the Wolfson College auditorium, will feature 1-4 professional instrumental players, optional live or fixed electronics and video. Exact instrumentation will be decided based on accepted submissions. Submissions should indicate if AIMC should provide performers.

  • Performance 2, at an Oxford University performance space, will feature a flexible stage and electronics/projected visuals set-up suitable for music with more complex technical requirements. No live performers are provided, but musicians are welcome to perform their own works, or provide their own performers (this should be indicated in the submission)

  • Performance 3 is a club night at the Old Fire Station. This is a very flexible space with multiple rooms and areas. The event will feature music suitable for a club night including (but not limited to) beat-based, ambient, live electronic and algorave music.

Music submissions are submitted on PubPub and should include the title, online links to recordings and/or scores, a description (800-1000 words) of how the project relates to AI and the theme of the conference including contextual information relating the piece to relevant practices. In addition, submission should indicate which performance options it is suited for, and any access, technical, or performer requirements as well as short programme notes.